Hodges v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the private rights of a party that have been vested by the judgment o f a court cannot be taken away by subsequent legis­ lation
• discussing public rights and private rights in context of due process and vested rights
• noting that the normal rule against disturbing final judgments “does not apply to a suit brought for the enforcement of a public right, which, even after it has been established by the judgment of the court, may be annulled by subsequent legislation and should not be thereafter enforced”
• analyzing the distinction in the context of due process and vested rights
• discussing public rights and private rights in context of due process and vested rights
• analyzing the distinction in the context of due process and vested rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).