Hodge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, among other things, that a determination of whether a party is indispensable must be based on the specific facts of each case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• JKLB FARMS, LLC v. Phillips
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2007-06-15· cited 18×
• Walden v. Es Capital, 1091474 (Ala. 5-20-2011)
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-05-20· cited 15×
• Hildreth v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-05-28· cited 6×
• HILLBERT v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-09-24· cited 1×
• Bharara Segar, LLC v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-11-04
• Wilmore v. Wilmore, 2100101 (ala.civ.app. 8-19-2011)
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2011-08-19

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holland v. City of Alabaster
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-07-06· cited 24×
• Jetton v. Jetton
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-02-06· cited 24×
• Felder v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1987-08-26· cited 15×
• Baer v. Alco Land and Timber Company, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1973-11-21· cited 9×
• First National Bank of Columbiana v. State
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-08-19· cited 5×
• Hodge v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-07-16· cited 1×