Skip to main content
· 8/8/2001

Hodge v. Lott

Citations

  • 553 S.E.2d 652
  • 251 Ga. App. 288
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2577
  • 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • absent contemporaneous objection ruled on by the trial court, the objection not preserved for appellate review
  • “When a portion of the record is not before this court which is necessary for our determination of one or more of the appellate issues raised, an affirmance as to those issues must result.”
  • “When a portion of the record is not before this court which is necessary for our determination of one or more of the appellate issues raised, an affirmance as to those issues must result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Miller, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.