Hodak v. City of St. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that third party actually asserts his own rights, no hindrance exists, and third-party standing is improper”
• stating that a litigant seeking to assert claims on behalf of a third party must actually assert the rights of the third party
• explaining a party must suffer an “injury in fact” of “an actual or imminent concrete and particularized invasion to a legally protected interest” to have standing
• stating that standing determinations are reviewed de novo
• “As a general rule, a plaintiff may only assert his own injury in fact and ‘cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties.’”
• “As a general rule, a plaintiff may only assert his own injury in fact and ‘cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).