· 8/5/1998
Hockley Ex Rel. Hockley v. Shan Enterprises Ltd. Partnership
Citations
- 19 F. Supp. 2d 235
- 42 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 105
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12316
- 1998 WL 564598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the ruling in Cooter & Gell conflicts with the safe harbor provision
- “The express purpose of [the 1993 Amendments] to the rule was to prevent abuses of Rule 11 sanctions by providing parties a ‘safe harbor’ within which they will not be subject to sanctions unless they refuse to withdraw offending papers filed with the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brotman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.