Hocking Conservancy District v. Dodson-Lindblom Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that engineering was not one of the traditional professions at common law and, accordingly, not subject to the malpractice statute of limitations
• \only physicians and lawyers” can commit \malpractice” under both R.C. 2305.11(A) and its common-law definition
• which limits malpractice actions to the professions of lawyers and physicians because they exercise independent judgment directly affecting their client/patient and necessarily will often fail to fulfill expectations yet fulfill their professional duties
• professional engineer is not considered to have committed “malpractice”
• Negligence of professional engineer did not constitute malpractice.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).