Skip to main content
· 8/8/2005

Hockema v. J.S. Ex Rel. Secrest

Citations

  • 832 N.E.2d 537
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1421
  • 2005 WL 1862707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Indiana statute is a type of modi‐ fied fifty percent comparative fault law. … Thus, if a claimant is deemed to be more than fifty percent at fault, then the claimant is barred from recovery.”
  • “The Indiana statute is a type of modi‐ fied fifty percent comparative fault law. … Thus, if a claimant is deemed to be more than fifty percent at fault, then the claimant is barred from recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sharpnack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.