Skip to main content
· 10/15/2013

Hockaday v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 455
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 304
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
  • 571 U.S. 965
  • 2013 WL 4776733
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding comity and judicial efficiency warrant sua sponte consideration of res judicata
  • affirming sua sponte consideration of claim preclusion where “the district court here has expended significant judicial resources on determining whether the plaintiffs are entitled to relief’
  • concluding sua sponte consideration was merited due to the plaintiff’s “ongoing failure to recognize the finality of the state court orders,” as evidenced by the many “state court[] . . . hearings and . . . numerous related suits and appeals” instigated by the plaintiff
  • affirming district court's sua sponte consideration of res judicata in a FSIA case
  • affirming district court’s sua sponte consideration of res judicata in a FSIA case
  • reviewing sua sponte invocation of res judicata by the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.