· 10/15/2013
Hockaday v. United States
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 455
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 304
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3216
- 571 U.S. 965
- 2013 WL 4776733
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding comity and judicial efficiency warrant sua sponte consideration of res judicata
- affirming sua sponte consideration of claim preclusion where “the district court here has expended significant judicial resources on determining whether the plaintiffs are entitled to relief’
- concluding sua sponte consideration was merited due to the plaintiff’s “ongoing failure to recognize the finality of the state court orders,” as evidenced by the many “state court[] . . . hearings and . . . numerous related suits and appeals” instigated by the plaintiff
- affirming district court's sua sponte consideration of res judicata in a FSIA case
- affirming district court’s sua sponte consideration of res judicata in a FSIA case
- reviewing sua sponte invocation of res judicata by the district court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.