Hock v. Soles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this court reviews admission of evidence under Minn. R. Evid. 403 for abuse of discretion
• addressing only the Fifth Amendment when appellant mentioned article I, section 7, of the Minnesota Constitution in his brief, but raised only Fifth-Amendment arguments
• addressing only Fifth Amendment when appellant mentioned article I, section 7, of Minnesota Constitution in his brief but based arguments only on Fifth Amendment
• “Under Minnesota law, a delay of more than 60 days from the date of the speedy-trial demand is presumptively prejudicial, triggering review of the remaining three factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).