· 4/27/2010
Hochstadt v. Boston Scientific Corp.
Citations
- 708 F. Supp. 2d 95
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41007
- 2010 WL 1704003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding typicality where plaintiff’s ERISA claims were “based on the same basic legal theory as the claims of all other class members”
- finding Rule 23(b)(1) satisfied where plaintiffs brought an ERISA claim on behalf of the plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas P. Woodlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.