Skip to main content
· 5/7/1909

Hochberger v. Ludvigh

Citations

  • 116 N.Y.S. 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that remand is required where “the ALJ failed to explain the weight (if any) afforded to the opinions of examining physician . ... [causing the court to be] unable to determine whether the ALJ duly considered all of the medical opinions of record’
  • ALJ failed to sufficiently explain his rationale for declining to credit portions of treating physician’s opinion while affording the opinion great weight
  • although an ALJ “made brief reference” to a medical opinion, the ALJ “failed to explain the weight (if any) afforded to the opinion . . . [and therefore] the Court is unable to determine whether the ALJ duly considered all of the medical opinions of record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.