Hobson v. Waggoner Engineering, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that engineer had no duty to warn, in part, because general contractor had \full and absolute control over the work site and the means and methods of construction\
• concluding that engineer owed no duty to warn or protect general contractors or subcontractors
• concluding that engineer owed no duty to warn or protect general contractors or subcontractors
• noting, when determining that engineer owed no duty to workers at construction site, that engineer did not have authority to supervise subcontractors
• noting, when determining that engineer owed no duty to workers at construction site, that engineer did not have authority to supervise subcontractors
• engineering consultant had no duty to ensure worker safety on construction site of a waste lagoon and concluding that plaintiff had pleaded insufficient facts to show any negligence in design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).