Hobbs v. State
Citations
- 44 Tex. 353
Syllabus
<p>1. Indictment.—The joinder in one indictment of the charges of theft and burglary is not a ground for arrest of judgment upon such in- • dietment on a conviction for burglary.</p> <p>2. Burglary.—The increased punishment fixed by the statute for the use of violence in effecting the crime of burglary, is attached to the use of actual force directed to effecting an entrance or toward some person, and such violence must be alleged to sustain a verdict for. the increased punishment.</p> <p>3. Same—Charge of court.—In an indictment for burglary, in which there was no allegation of force, it is error to instruct the jury that if the defendant “ effected the entry by force ” the increased punishment could be assessed.</p> <p>4. Bill of exceptions.—Without a bill of exceptions the action of a court in refusing a motion to change the venue will not be considered.</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-28· cited 125×
- Gooden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1940-11-27· cited 39×
- United States v. Steven McCloudSixth Circuit· 2013-09-17· cited 33×
- Wilcox v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 2×
- Searcy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.