Hobbs v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to pierce corporate veil where parent’s and subsidiary’s funds were not commingled, parent maintained separate bank accounts, and parent transacted business in its own name
• finding trial court erred in exercising general jurisdiction over insurance carrier, where it issued one life insurance policy to state resident, maintained certificate of authority to transact insurance in state and held mortgage on real property within the state
• fact that defendant had a certificate of authority to transact insurance in Florida and had issued one insurance policy to a Florida resident held not “substantial”
• the supreme court in Pepsico “specifically noted that no due process issue existed, presumably because Pepsico’s minimum contacts with the state of Florida were not questioned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).