Skip to main content
· 7/1/1850

Hobbs v. Clements

Citations

  • 32 Me. 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sanction of precluding party from damages portion of trial was excessive
  • holding that sanction of precluding party from damages portion of trial was excessive
  • noting that in default judgment, defaulting party is deemed to admit liability and then plaintiff must introduce evidence of non-liquidated damages
  • noting that in default judgment, defaulting party is deemed to admit liability and then plaintiff must introduce evidence of non- liquidated damages
  • stating that decision by court of appeals becomes law of case in trial court and court of appeals
  • observing that “default judgments may generally be categorized as pre- or post-answer” but “other variations exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.