Hobbs v. Alabama Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an employer’s “intentional tortious conduct . . . ‘committed beyond the bounds of the employer’s proper role,’ is actionable notwithstanding the exclusivity provisions of the act.” (quoting Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co., 547 So. 2d 90, 95 (Ala. 1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).