Hobart v. Bartlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding attorney’s testimony that he believed his fees were reasonable and necessary, that he was familiar with the customary fees in the community, and that he believed his fees fall within that range was sufficient for attorney’s fee award
• “And although Mother and Father both indicated in their testimony that they continued to have difficulty communicating and getting along with each other, there is no evidence that the difficulty was new or different since the entry of the prior order.”
• “Testimony from a party’s attorney about a party’s attorneys’ fees is taken as true as a matter of law if the testimony is not contradicted by any other witness and is clear, positive, direct, and free from contradiction.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).