Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[l]aw of the case is a prudential rule rather than a jurisdictional one”
• noting that law of the case is a “prudential rule rather than a jurisdictional one”
• \[F]orcing appellees to put forth every conceivable ground for affirmance might increase the complexity and scope of appeals.\
• \[F]orcing appellees to put forth every conceivable ground for affirmance might increase the complexity and scope of appeals.\
• “forcing appellees to put forth every conceivable alternative ground for af- No. 02-2033 3 firmance might increase the complexity and scope of appeals more than it would streamline the progress of the litigation”
• finding no waiver of issue omitted in prior appeal by then-appellee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).