Skip to main content
· 5/14/1915

Hoban v. Hudson

Citations

  • 129 Minn. 335
  • 152 N.W. 723
  • 1915 Minn. LEXIS 703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the separate-vote requirement satisfied as long as all parts of the proposed constitutional amendment “may be logically viewed as parts or aspects of a single plan”
  • holding the separate-vote requirement satisfied as long as all parts of the proposed constitutional amendment “may be logically viewed as parts or aspects of a single plan”
  • commenting “[o]nly one provision of the Constitution was changed”
  • commenting \[o]nly one provision of the Constitution was changed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.