· 5/14/1915
Hoban v. Hudson
Citations
- 129 Minn. 335
- 152 N.W. 723
- 1915 Minn. LEXIS 703
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the separate-vote requirement satisfied as long as all parts of the proposed constitutional amendment “may be logically viewed as parts or aspects of a single plan”
- holding the separate-vote requirement satisfied as long as all parts of the proposed constitutional amendment “may be logically viewed as parts or aspects of a single plan”
- commenting “[o]nly one provision of the Constitution was changed”
- commenting \[o]nly one provision of the Constitution was changed\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.