Hoban v. BOSTON RETIREMENT BOARD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the language of § 58, unlike that of § 57, vests only a ministerial, nondiscretionaiy function in the board
• where some versions of bill said, “may,” and others said, “shall,” selection of “shall” reflected legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).