Skip to main content
· 4/22/1994

Hoarty v. Midwest Carriers Corp. (In Re Best Refrigerated Express, Inc.)

Citations

  • 168 B.R. 978
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • small-business exemption “stands on its own, without reference to the operating or non-operating status of the carrier”
  • “Had Congress intended the ‘no longer transporting property1 clause of (f)(1)(A) to apply to (f)(9), the small business concern paragraph, it would have listed paragraph (9) with (2), (3) and (4) under Section 10107(f)(1), as it did under 10701(f)(7).”
  • discussing legislative history of section 9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timothy J. Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.