Hoang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that under ADA, employers may periodically ask for reasonable documentation on the need for reasonable 26 accommodations
• finding that a warning letter that did not materially change the terms and conditions of the plaintiff's employment was not an adverse employment action
• concluding a warning letter that did not implement material change in the terms and conditions of the plaintiff’s employment was not by itself an adverse employment action
• finding warning letter that did not implement change in terms and conditions of the plaintiff's employment was not an adverse employment action
• “[S]ince the letter did not implement any 20 materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of [plaintiff’s] employment, it was 21 not itself an adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).