Hoalcraft v. Smithson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the children‟s preferences alone were not sufficient proof of circumstances to warrant a change in custody
• “[T ]he correct inquiry was whether the childred would be harmed in any way if [the custodial parent] retained custody.”
• perm. app. denied May 15, 2000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).