· 4/6/1950
Hoague-Sprague Corp. v. Bird & Son, Inc.
Citations
- 91 F. Supp. 159
- 85 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 188
- 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2704
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he court concludes that this court may exercise general jurisdiction over [the defendant] based on its systematic and continuous contacts with Texas via a pervasive, systematic, and continuous local advertising campaign.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCarthy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.