Skip to main content

Hoag v. Hoag

Citations

  • 646 A.2d 578
  • 435 Pa. Super. 428
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding been filed, to clarify and correct its prior support order, conformed with Rule 1701(b)(1) because it was not a substantive modification of the prior support order
  • holding order, after an appeal had been filed, to clarify and correct its prior support order, conformed with Rule 1701(b)(1) because it was not a substantive modification of the prior support order
  • “Husband’s actual financial condition is determinative. The trial court, in calculating a support award, must consider every aspect of a party’s financial ability to pay, including property interests, stocks and other forms of investment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tamilia, Hudock, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.