Hoag v. Ent. Holdings
Citations
- 168 N.E.3d 142
- 2021 Ohio 506
Syllabus
Motion to disqualify abuse of discretion motion to compel final appealable order substantial hardship Prof.Cond.R. 37 waiver. We overturned the decision of the trial court granting the defendant-appellee's motion to disqualify plaintiff-appellant's counsel for an abuse of discretion. We found that the appellees waived their right to the motion by delaying and that the delay, and the disqualification, would create a substantial hardship for the plaintiff. The plaintiff-appellant also appealed the decision of the trial court denying his motion to compel business records but we found that did not constitute a final appealable order.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Seventh Circuit· 1982-11-09· cited 277×
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-11-26· cited 158×
- Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-01-21· cited 117×
- Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-15· cited 116×
- United States v. Ted JohnstonSeventh Circuit· 1982-10-01· cited 90×
- 155 North High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 70×
- Manning v. Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & AllenSixth Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 57×
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-07· cited 46×
- SST Castings, Inc. v. Amana Appliances, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2002-10-18· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.