HNTB Georgia, Inc. v. Hamilton-King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using “manifest abuse of discretion” standard to review trial court’s ruling on admission or exclusion of expert testimony
• upholding trial court’s exclusion of expert testimony as unreliable when expert conceded he had no experience in the design or evaluation of construction traffic control patterns about which he opined
• discussing four noninclusive factors courts should use as a starting point in determining reliability
• “In determining the admissibility of expert testimony, the trial court acts as a gatekeeper, assessing both the witnesses] qualifications to testify in a particular area of expertise and the relevancy and reliability of the proffered testimony” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).