HML II, Inc. v. Ginley (In Re HML II, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of request to file late appeal, considering only the circumstances leading to the failure to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner
• affirming denial of request to file late appeal, considering only the circumstances leading to the failure to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner
• finding debtor’s attorney’s failure to properly compute the time for filing appeal under Rule 8002(a) due to inadvertently relying upon Fed. R. Bankr.P. 6 and his unfamiliarity with bankruptcy procedure did not constitute excusable neglect
• “an unintentional oversight occasioned by its attorney’s unfamiliarity with bankruptcy procedure” did not excused missed appeal deadline because, after Pioneer, misreading a rule or statute does not meet that standard
• debtor’s attorney’s failure to properly compute the time for filing appeal under Rule 8002(a) due to inadvertently relying upon Fed. R. Bankr.P. 6 and his unfamiliarity with bankruptcy procedure did not constitute excusable neglect
• ignorance of calendaring rule not excusable neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).