H.L. Smith, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that no financial data or a “detailed breakdown of costs” need be submitted to meet the “sum certain” requirement
• explaining that the Federal Circuit “has identified three requirements for a valid CDA claim: (1) the contractor must submit the demand in writing to the contracting officer, (2) the contractor must submit the demand as a matter of right, and (3
• finding claim presented was a valid CDA claim despite lack of detailed cost information
• referring to “[o]ther Lost Profits (i.e., other lost revenues, incremental operating expenses, etc.)”
• “The contractor may supply adequate notice of the basis and amount of the claim without accounting for each cost component.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).