H.J. Baker & Bro., Inc. v. Orgonics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• focusing on fact that two companies “operated from the same manufacturing plant,” not on whether they both owned the premises
• noting that two companies “sold virtually identical [ ] products”
• noting that two companies \sold virtually identical [] products\
• finding evidence of a \mere continuation\ through the same principal officer in both entities, selling identical products, and operating from the same manufacturing plant as the selling company
• plaintiff’s tax deduction for money owed to it by defendant was irrelevant to defendant’s abuse of process counterclaim because deduction did not bar plaintiff from seeking to recover debt
• clearly noting that the facts and circumstances of the case should be considered as a whole, and, therefore, suggesting that all of the factors need not be met to sustain a claim under the \mere continuation\ theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).