Hite v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the subjectivity of a methodology is not fatal under [Federal] Rule 702 and Daubert”
• limiting an expert’s conclusions to those within a “reasonable degree of certainty in the ballistics field” 35 or a “reasonable degree of ballistics certainty”
• limiting an expert’s conclusions to those within a “reasonable degree of certainty in the ballistics field” 35 or a “reasonable degree of ballistics certainty”
• limiting expressions of an expert’s conclusions to that of a “reasonable degree of ballistics certainty” or a “reasonable degree of certainty in the ballistics field.”
• granting motion to bar firearms expert from testifying that his conclusions were accurate “to the exclusion of all other firearms”
• allowing expert to testify that the firearms match was reached to a “reasonable degree of ballistics certainty” or a “reasonable degree of certainty in the ballistics field”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).