Hite v. Kendall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that inconsistency in the Government’s communication with the contractor rendered its position in terminating a contract for default not substantially justified
• “[T]he government argues that United did not raise an excusability defense prior to the termination for default!,]” and “[t]he government alleges there was no harm to United because United was on notice.”
• “For a default termination to be converted to a termination for convenience on the basis of procedural error, the contractor bears the burden to show that it was harmed or prejudiced by the government’s error.”
• order dismissing appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).