Skip to main content
· 8/30/1887

Hitchcock v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 73 Cal. 295
  • 14 P. 872
  • 1887 Cal. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s dismissal of an appeal when three-month delay was caused by appellant’s designation in the notice of appeal that a non-existent transcript would be included in the record and on appellant’s failure to check on the status of the appeal
  • affirming the trial court’s dismissal of an appeal when three-month delay was caused by appellant’s designation in the notice of appeal that a nonexistent transcript would be included in the record and on appellant’s failure to check on the status of the appeal
  • affirming the trial court’s dismissal of an appeal when three-month delay was caused by appellant’s designation in the notice of appeal that a nonexistent transcript would be included in the record and on appellant’s failure to check on the status of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Paterson, Searls, Sharpstein, Temple, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.