Skip to main content
· 11/15/1912

Hitchcock v. Cafe Raub, Inc.

Citations

  • 153 A.D. 901
  • 138 N.Y.S. 1121

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that cancellation agreement may be set aside for coercion or duress only in an “action in equity brought for that purpose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.