Skip to main content
· 8/10/1992

Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. Leatherman

Citations

  • 420 S.E.2d 843
  • 309 S.C. 174
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that words used in a statute “must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resort to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand its operation”
  • noting that in construing a statute, its words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resort to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute’s operation
  • noting the words of the statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute’s operation
  • stating the words of a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand a statute's operation
  • stating the words of a statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning -without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand a statute’s operation
  • stating the words of the statute must be given their plain and ordinary meaning without resorting to subtle or forced construction to limit or expand the statute’s operation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.