Hirshauer v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the three year statute of limitations appropriate where \[p]laintiffs have alleged willfulness in their Complaint\
• finding the three year statute of limitations appropriate where “[p]laintiffs have alleged willfulness in their Complaint”
• noting “growing trend” in the Eastern District had been to limit notice to three years, especially when there were not a significant number of potential plaintiffs
• “At the conditional certification stage, courts merely require substantial allegations that the putative class members were together the victims of a single decision, policy or plan.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The Plaintiffs have alleged willfulness in their Complaint ... and the Defendants deny these allegations. Courts in this circuit have generally held that where willfulness is in dispute, a three year statute of limitations applies at the conditional certification stage.”
• “The Plaintiffs have alleged willfulness in their Complaint ... and the Defendants deny these allegations. Courts in this circuit have generally held that where willfulness is in dispute, a three year statute of limitations applies at the conditional certification stage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).