Skip to main content
· 11/26/1975

Hirschkop v. Virginia State Bar Ass'n

Citations

  • 406 F. Supp. 721
  • 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that allegations “related to actions taken or statements made during the course of the -instant judicial proceeding... . as a matter of law are inadequate for recusation”
  • finding that pro se litigants must satisfy § 144’s procedural requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warriner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.