Skip to main content
· 10/12/1978

Hirsch v. Lehman

Citations

  • 65 A.D.2d 523
  • 409 N.Y.S.2d 220
  • 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding teacher’s sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge action arose out of employment and coverage was barred by employee exclusion, even though “some of the alleged acts of sexual harassment [took place] away from the school____”
  • applying employee exclusion although some alleged acts of harassment occurred outside workplace
  • sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge action arose out of employment and thus employee exclusion applied to bar coverage
  • sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge action arose out of employment and thus employee exclusion applied to bar coverage
  • allegations that school district failed to stop or prevent certain conduct do not change gravamen of complaint from intentional acts to negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.