Hirsch v. Jupiter Golf Club LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must establish the predicate acts in an FRO by a preponderance of the evidence
• holding that a plaintiff must establish the predicate acts in an FRO by a preponderance of the evidence
• holding not every dispute or disturbance between family members is sufficient to warrant the Act's application
• holding not every dispute or disturbance between family members is sufficient to warrant the Act's application
• finding wife would be entitled to a self-defense justification for hitting her husband if she did so in order to flee from him
• noting the statutory factors are \nonexclusive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).