Hirpa v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the Good Samaritan Act and noting that “[t]he statute does not cut an unnecessarily wide swath through causes of action against medical providers”
• upholding the Good Samaritan Act and noting that \[the statute does not cut an unnecessarily wide swath through causes of action against medical providers\
• selecting version of questions that better characterized legal issues to be resolved
• selecting version of questions that better characterized legal issues to be resolved
• physicians are protected by the Act when they respond to in-hospital emergency if they have no preexisting duty to do so
• physicians are protected by the Act when they respond to in-hospital emergency if they have no preexisting duty to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).