Skip to main content

Hinton v. Waste Techniques Corp.

Citations

  • 364 A.2d 724
  • 243 Pa. Super. 189
  • 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant was due no relief because it failed to seek specific instructions and failed to bring other alleged errors to the trial court’s attention at the proper time
  • “An attorney [in a civil case] cannot promise to prove certain facts to the jury, fail to prove them, and then expect to escape with impunity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.