Hinton v. Hinton (In Re Hinton)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing an entireties exemption on a federal income tax refund check from a jointly filed tax return
• with respect to real property acquired in the name of husband and wife, a rule of construction exists that a tenancy by the entireties is created, absent fraud
• “Section 522(o) begins with the limiting language: ‘For purposes of subsection (b)(3)(A).’ Thus, by its explicit terms, Section 522(o) applies only to Bankruptcy Code Section 522(b)(3)(A), and not, as the plaintiffs assert, to Section 522(b)(3)(B).”
• “in the absence of any controlling statute, express agreement, account statement, or other governing indicia that explicitly establishes a form of ownership other than tenancy by the entireties, Beal Bank's presumption also is applicable to all personal property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).