Hinson v. Eaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resolving that “nothing in the record shows that [the appellant] agreed to extend the . . . hearing date because the judicial proceedings in this case, including the final hearing, . . . were not transcribed”
• stalking petition and ex parte TPO dismissed by operation of law where trial court continued TPO hearing and left TPO “in full effect” past 30-day deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).