Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 1/30/2006

Hinshaw v. Smith

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 997
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1633
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that because there was no constitutional violation under the Pickering/Connick test, there was no need to determine whether the right was clearly established
  • determining that because there was no constitutional violation under the Pickering/Connick test, there was no need to determine whether the right was clearly established
  • holding that introducing a bill is also quintessentially legislative
  • finding denial of summary judgment motion based on immunity defense was a reviewable interlocutory order
  • “We hesitate to expand the Elrod-Branti exception to a case where a party affiliation is not alleged as a basis for the termination.”
  • the Noen-Pennington doctrine “is a defense to liability premised on the defendant’s actions of exercising his own private rights to free speech and to petition the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.