Eighth Circuit· 1/30/2006
Hinshaw v. Smith
Citations
- 436 F.3d 997
- 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1633
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2240
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that because there was no constitutional violation under the Pickering/Connick test, there was no need to determine whether the right was clearly established
- determining that because there was no constitutional violation under the Pickering/Connick test, there was no need to determine whether the right was clearly established
- holding that introducing a bill is also quintessentially legislative
- finding denial of summary judgment motion based on immunity defense was a reviewable interlocutory order
- “We hesitate to expand the Elrod-Branti exception to a case where a party affiliation is not alleged as a basis for the termination.”
- the Noen-Pennington doctrine “is a defense to liability premised on the defendant’s actions of exercising his own private rights to free speech and to petition the government.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.