Hinshaw v. Dyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where the transcript is \unintelligible ... we are simply unable to come to grips with the issues now sought to be raised by the plaintiff in error\
• \[A] reviewing court may of its own motion dismiss a proceeding where the record is confused or incomplete.\
• colloquy between counsel and trial court cannot take the place of sworn testimony
• if appellate record is incomplete, regularity and correctness of trial court proceedings presumed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).