Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/8/2000
Hinsdale v. Sherman
Citations
- 171 Vt. 605
- 764 A.2d 1218
- 2000 Vt. LEXIS 316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pleadings must contain some allegation “that if proven would permit recovery”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-09-23· cited 83×
- USGen New England, Inc. v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-11-07· cited 14×
- Draxxion Talandar v. Elizabeth Manchester-MurphySupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-12-20· cited 9×
- Victoria diMonda v. Lincoln National Corp. D/B/A Lincoln Financial GroupSupreme Court of Vermont· 2025-08-08· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrisseau v. FayetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-11-09· cited 87×
- Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-10-29· cited 43×
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-12-15· cited 26×
- In Re Estate of GortonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-12-12· cited 20×
- Cameron v. Double A. Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-31· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.