Skip to main content
· 10/18/1972

Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

Citations

  • 501 P.2d 1176
  • 8 Cal. 3d 150
  • 104 Cal. Rptr. 456
  • 37 Cal. Comp. Cases 734
  • 1972 Cal. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that transportation from ranch to ranch was an essential requirement of the job; the presence of the car was requisite to performance of the job; the worker was impliedly required to bring the car to the job and to take it from the j ob

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tobriner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.