Skip to main content
· 4/3/1899

Hinnricks v. Monteleone

Citations

  • 51 La. Ann. 896
  • 25 So. 546
  • 1899 La. LEXIS 493

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus</p> <p>1. It appears by the slatement of facts that relator consented to pay for the work done by the workman, in whose favor judgment was pronounced, after the loss of his house, which rendered useless the completion of the work (almost complete at the time of the accident).</p> <p>The District Court and Court of Appeals, upon the state of facts shown, decided that the workman was not at fault. This court found no ground to-grant an application to review the proceedings.</p>

Judges: Breaux

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.