Indiana Supreme Court· 2/5/1891
Hinkle v. State
Citations
- 127 Ind. 490
- 26 N.E. 777
- 1891 Ind. LEXIS 245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Fjather has the right to administer proper and reasonable chastisement to his child without being guilty of an assault and battery, but he has no right to administer unreasonable chastisement, or to be guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment of his child-”
- “[Fjather has the right to administer proper and reasonable chastisement to his child without being guilty of an assault and battery, but he has no right to administer unreasonable chastisement, or to be guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment of his child....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-13· cited 103×
- Willis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-06-10· cited 45×
- Carpenter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1947-10-13· cited 44×
- State v. StraightMontana Supreme Court· 1959-12-10· cited 33×
- Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals· 1924-01-16· cited 32×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-02-24· cited 18×
- State v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1953-09-22· cited 15×
- People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court· 1909-03-15· cited 15×
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-06-29· cited 9×
- People v. CurtissAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1931-06-19· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.