· 6/4/1971
Hinkle v. Rockville Motor Co.
Citations
- 278 A.2d 42
- 262 Md. 502
- 1971 Md. LEXIS 948
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing the rule discussed in Pendergast as a ‘“benefit of bargain’” formula
- characterizing the rule discussed in Pendergast as a “‘benefit of bargain’” formula
- “this court has never taken a rigid stand in adopting one theory of damages to the exclusion of all others but has rather employed a flexible approach”
- \this court has never taken a rigid stand in adopting one theory of damages to the exclusion of all others but has rather employed a flexible approach\
- collects and discusses most Maryland cases on measure of damages in deceit actions
- describing cost to conform damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hammond, Barnes, McWilliams, Finan, Singley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.