Skip to main content
· 6/4/1971

Hinkle v. Rockville Motor Co.

Citations

  • 278 A.2d 42
  • 262 Md. 502
  • 1971 Md. LEXIS 948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing the rule discussed in Pendergast as a ‘“benefit of bargain’” formula
  • characterizing the rule discussed in Pendergast as a “‘benefit of bargain’” formula
  • “this court has never taken a rigid stand in adopting one theory of damages to the exclusion of all others but has rather employed a flexible approach”
  • \this court has never taken a rigid stand in adopting one theory of damages to the exclusion of all others but has rather employed a flexible approach\
  • collects and discusses most Maryland cases on measure of damages in deceit actions
  • describing cost to conform damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Barnes, McWilliams, Finan, Singley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.